Birds sing from the heart. While other four-limbed animals like mammals and reptiles make sounds with voiceboxes in their throats, birds’ chirps originate in a unique vocal organ called the syrinx, located in their chests. No other animals have a syrinx, and scientists aren’t sure how or when it evolved. In a new study in the Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science, an interdisciplinary team of developmental biologists, evolutionary morphologists, and physiologists examined the windpipes of birds, crocodiles, salamanders, mice, and cats to learn more about how syrinxes evolved. Their findings seem to confirm: the syrinx is an evolutionary odd duck. But it might have arisen from a reinforcement at the bottom of the windpipe that we still see in many other animals.
“Birds have a unique organ in their airway to produce sounds — it’s like a flute,” says Chad Eliason, a postdoctoral researcher at Chicago’s Field Museum and co-first author of the study. “We don’t know where that organ came from, how and why it evolved. But in this study, when we zoomed out and looked at the windpipes of other animals, we found deep similarities that we didn’t expect.”
Mammals, birds, and reptiles all have a trachea — a tube connecting the nose and mouth to the lungs. And we all have a larynx — a hollow, muscular organ at the top of that tube that helps air pass through to the lungs and keeps food from falling into the airway. In mammals and reptiles, the larynx has little folds of tissue that vibrate when air passes over them, producing sound. In birds, the larynx can’t produce sound — it’s only there for breathing and eating. Instead, birds’ sounds are produced at the bottom of the trachea, just above where the trachea branches into the lungs. This juncture, made of cartilage, is the syrinx.
“The syrinx is a tiny box of cartilage — in a sparrow, it’s about 8 millimeters in diameter, about four times the thickness of a strand of spaghetti,” says Eliason. “It reinforces the airway, and when air passes over the folds in it, it produces a sound: birdsong.”
Since birds have both a syrinx and a larynx, it’s unclear exactly when the syrinx took over sound production duty for the larynx. “Birds’ closest living relatives, crocodiles, produce sound in their throats with a larynx. So how did ancestors of birds transition from making sounds with their larynx to making sounds with their syrinx?” asks Eliason. “If we found fossil evidence of a syrinx in dinosaurs, that would be a smoking gun, but we haven’t yet. In the meantime, we have to look at other animals for clues.”
Eliason and his fellow scientists, including co-first author Evan Kingsley of Harvard Medical School, examined the tracheas of a suite of animals. Cats, mice, and crocs all have a set of fused cartilage rings at the base of the trachea, called the carina, that provides structural support where the trachea branches to the lungs — just like a syrinx does. “Perhaps the syrinx is just a byproduct of reinforcing the airway, like a carina does in other animals,” says Eliason.
The existence of structures like the syrinx and the carina aren’t new to science — people have known about them for decades. But this study provides a new way of looking at them. “We’re deepening our understanding of how these structures are related to each other, and that could help us understand how the syrinx evolved in the first place,” says Julia Clarke, professor at University of Texas at Austin and a leading author of the study.
The study also sheds light on birds’ ability to produce sounds throughout their evolutionary history. According to Eliason and colleagues, there are two ways it could have gone down. In Scenario A, extinct ancestors of birds made sounds with their larynxes, then lost the ability to make sounds with their larynxes and had a period where they couldn’t sing, and then they regained the ability to make sounds with the origin of a syrinx. In Scenario B, bird ancestors made sounds with a larynx, then they developed a syrinx possibly for structural support of the airway, the syrinx became able to produce sound, and after a while, birds only produced sound with their syrinxes and lost the ability to make sounds with their larynxes. This study suggests that Scenario B is more likely. “It seems more intuitive to me that birds’ development of the syrinx would have been step-wise, that they’d have maintained their ability to make sounds with both the larynx and the syrinx, and then gradually lost the ability to make sound with the larynx,” says Eliason. “The other option would have birds and their dinosaur ancestors experiencing a sort of quiet zone when they couldn’t make any sounds. From looking at dinosaurs’ skulls, we know they could hear, and it wouldn’t make sense for them to be able to hear but not be able to make sounds to communicate.” The researchers also note that the presence of a perfectly functional larynx in the closest relatives of birds make Scenario B less likely than the first scenario.
Kingsley says he hopes this study will be useful for all scientists studying how new features evolve. “One of the grand challenges in biology is understanding how novel structures arise, why we see weird traits in some organisms,” he says. “This study gives us an idea of how one of those novel structures, the syrinx, might have come about.” Eliason also notes that the evolution of the syrinx is inextricably linked to the evolution of birdsong, and thus, of birds themselves. “Birdsong is what they use to communicate, to find mates and warn each other of predators. It’s because of the syrinx that birds can produce all these different sounds. There are over ten thousand species of birds, each with a different call — their ability to produce all these sounds could have played a role in generating the bird diversity that we see today.”
The research was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Grant 4498).