Researchers Recreate Skull of Mysterious Neanderthal Cousin

1
2819
Researchers Recreate Skull of Mysterious Neanderthal Cousin
Researchers Recreate Skull of Mysterious Neanderthal Cousin

Researchers have for the first time restructured Denisovans’ skeletal features, using DNA methylation (chemical changes), to understand how the long–lost human relative looked like, the Nature reported.

A team of computational biologists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found Denisovans shared Neanderthal’s facial features, but had a wider jaw and skull.

In 2010, researchers sequenced the genome of the previously unknown group of extinct humans from a finger bone found in the Denisova cave in Siberia.

From their genome, we know that Denisovans split off from the Neanderthals around 400,000 years ago, and that at various times they interbred with both the Neanderthals and members of our own species.

But their appearance has remained a mystery.

That’s because aside from the original finger bone, only a handful of teeth and a jawbone have ever been clearly identified as belonging to Denisovans.

To find a work-around, David Gokhman and Liran Carmel.

Scientists have long tried to figure out a person’s appearance based on the information contained in their genome. But the sequence of As, Ts, Gs and Cs isn’t enough, says Liran.

READ  Research: Pointy eggs more likely to stay put in birds' cliffside nests, study finds --

“Police would be very happy if they can build an identikit of people based on their DNA sequence, but they simply still cannot do it,” he says. “We took a totally different approach to this.”

Instead of looking at the DNA sequence, Liran and his colleagues searched for patches in the genome that contain tiny chemical blips called methylation. These subtle changes flag gene regulatory regions which dampen a gene’s activity or switch it off entirely.

By comparing DNA methylation patterns in Denisovans to those in modern humans, Neanderthals and chimpanzees, the team could infer which genes are dialled up or down in each group.

“Many anatomical features that change during evolution, the change is attributed to changes in gene regulation, not necessarily changes in gene or DNA sequence,” says Liran.

They then ran these up- or down-regulated genes through a database of human genetic disorders where switching a gene off is known to affect a person’s physical traits.

READ  Research: Algae have land genes --

The team first tested whether their method could accurately predict the physical characteristics of Neanderthals and chimpanzees.

Their method was more than 80% accurate at predicting how a particular trait – such as the thickness of tooth enamel or the width of the face – differs between modern humans and Neanderthals or chimpanzees.

Confident their method was working, they set about predicting what a Denisovan might have looked like.

The team identified 56 skeletal traits where Denisovans differed from modern humans, Neanderthals, or both – 34 of them in the skull.

As expected, Denisovans likely looked more similar to Neanderthals than to modern humans, with a large ribcage and pelvis and low forehead, but they probably had a wider skull than both modern humans and Neanderthals.

Their dental arch was also longer, according to the prediction, which fits with the large Denisovan molars that have been found.

READ  Research: Scientists argue for more comprehensive studies of Cascade volcanoes --

While the research was under review, the discovery of a Denisovan mandible was announced. Most features matched those the team predicted.

“This was amazing for us, because it was an immediate independent validation of our model,” says Liran.

The findings also lend weight to speculation that two 100,000 year old skulls found in Xuchang in China could belong to Denisovans.

“One of the major properties of these crania is that they were very wide,” says Liran.

Palaeoanthropologist Chris Stringer from the Natural History Museum in London, who was not involved in the study calls it “a pioneering piece of research, which at first glance seems almost like science fiction”.

“This is exciting work, pushing the boundaries of what can be gleaned from ancient genomes,” he says.

The study relies on a complex chain of extrapolations, Stringer notes. Nevertheless, “the results are fully falsifiable by future discoveries”.

Loading...

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.