The textbook giant-impact theory goes like this: late in the formation of the Solar System came the giant-impact phase, when hot protoplanets collided with each other.

The moon is relatively big compared to the planet it orbits, and it’s made of almost the same stuff, minus some more volatile compounds that evaporated long ago. That makes it distinct from every other major object in the solar system, said Sarah Stewart, professor of earth and planetary sciences at the University of California, Davis, and senior author on the paper.

“Every other body in the solar system has different chemistry,” she said.

The textbook theory of lunar formation goes like this: Late in the formation of the solar system came the “giant impact” phase, when hot, planet-sized objects collided with each other. A Mars-sized object grazed what would become Earth, throwing off a mass of material from which the moon condensed. This impact set the angular momentum for the Earth-moon system, and gave the early Earth a five-hour day. Over millennia, the moon has receded from the Earth and the rotation has slowed to our current 24-hour day.

Scientists have figured this out by looking at the moon’s current orbit, working out how rapidly angular momentum of the Earth-moon system has been transferred by the tidal forces between the two bodies, and working backward.

But there are a couple of problems with the textbook theory. One is the moon’s surprisingly Earth-like composition. Another is that if the moon condensed from a disk of material rotating around Earth’s equator, it should be in orbit over the equator. But the moon’s current orbit is tilted 5 degrees off the equator, meaning some more energy must have been put in to move it.

An alternative to explain it all

Stewart, her former postdoctoral fellow Matija Ćuk (now a scientist at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California), with Douglas Hamilton at the University of Maryland and Simon Lock, Harvard University, have come up with an alternative model.

In 2012, Ćuk and Stewart proposed that some of the angular momentum of the Earth-moon system could have been transferred to the Earth-sun system. That allows for a more energetic collision at the beginning of the process.

In the new model, a high-energy collision left a mass of vaporized and molten material from which the Earth and moon formed. The Earth was set spinning with a two-hour day, its axis pointing toward the sun.

Because the collision could have been more energetic than in the current theory, the material from Earth and the impactor would have mixed together, and both Earth and moon condensed from the same material and therefore have a similar composition.

As angular momentum was dissipated through tidal forces, the moon receded from the Earth until it reached a point called the “LaPlace plane transition,” where the forces from the Earth on the moon became less important than gravitational forces from the sun. This caused some of the angular momentum of the Earth-moon system to transfer to the Earth-sun system.

This made no major difference to the Earth’s orbit around the sun, but it did flip Earth upright. At this point, the models built by the team show the moon orbiting Earth at a high angle, or inclination, to the equator.

Over a few tens of million years, the moon continued to slowly move away from Earth until it reached a second transition point, the Cassini transition, at which point the inclination of the moon — the angle between the moon’s orbit and Earth’s equator — dropped to about 5 degrees, putting the moon more or less in its current orbit.

The new theory elegantly explains the moon’s orbit and composition based on a single, giant impact at the beginning, Stewart said. No extra intervening steps are required to nudge things along.

“One giant impact sets off the sequence of events,” she said.

The research was supported by NASA.

8 COMMENTS

  1. Very elegant. But what the present theory does not explain is how moon rock, not one or two, but general moon rock has been carbon dated to be over 1 billion years older than the earth.

  2. So, its still a giant-impact theory? No wonder republicans don’t trust scientists, you just rehash the same stuff over and over, just like hollywood.

  3. I find it hilarious that scientist keep changing their creation story. God’s has never changed “in the beginning God.”
    God has never changed He loves you sent His son to die for you.

  4. Love this stuff, and love the idea that this re-formulation of the most recent theory only changes the hypothesis slightly, still calling for an early collision, resulting in an earth and a moon.

  5. MY THEORY IS THE MOON WAS FORMED ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS THE EARTH. JUST LIKE THE EARTH, IT HAD WATER AND AIR BUT DRIED OUT QUICKER THAN THE EARTH FROM THE SUN SINCE IT IS TEN TIME SMALLER. WITHOUT WATER AND AIR , IT JUST STOP SPINNING AND DIED.

LEAVE A REPLY